Quiet Quitting and Startups: a Paradox - Millennials Decoded
()
Quiet Quitting
- Quiet quitting involves doing the minimum job requirements without additional effort or enthusiasm.
- It serves as a coping mechanism for Millennials and Gen Zs in response to large corporations, executive greed, and insufficient salaries.
- Quiet quitting can be seen as a form of protest against the current work culture and work-life imbalance.
- While it's fair to engage in quiet quitting, it's important to consider potential consequences, such as being at a disadvantage compared to those who overperform.
Benefits and Risks of Quiet Quitting
- Quiet quitting can reduce stress and provide more personal time, especially in a favorable job market.
- However, it can hinder professional growth and financial advancement, particularly in the current economic climate where the middle class is struggling.
Spending Habits and Quiet Quitting
- Millennials and Gen Zs prioritize travel, experiences, and eating out over traditional domestic life, influenced by aspirational content from luxury brands, tech companies, lifestyle influencers, and even friends.
- Quiet quitting may seem like a solution for those struggling to afford a house or kids, but it can lead to increased spending on experiences and tech gadgets.
Quiet Quitting in Startups
- Startups require ambitious and hard-working employees willing to take risks and reap the benefits of success, such as increased visibility, authority, and equity in the company.
- Founders should capitalize on their employees' ambition by providing fair rewards and opportunities for growth, avoiding excessive executive compensation that creates resentment.
- Quiet quitting may be more prevalent in large corporations with unfair earnings distribution, but it can be detrimental to the success of startups that rely on dedicated and motivated employees.